25.1
66.8 %
96.7 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is moderate, 66.8%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 11.1 | 8.6 | 11.0 | 10.7 | 10.8 | 9.1 | 13.9 | 75.0 | 93.0% | 1.0 |
| Article, other | 0.7 | NA | 0.8 | NA | NA | NA | 1.2 | 2.6 | 100.0% | 1.0 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 1.9 | 14.5 | 6.8 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 11.4 | 7.3 | 50.3 | 27.8% | 0.9 |
| Conference paper, other | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | NA | 0.2 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 0.0% | 0.1 |
| Chapter in book | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 0.0% | 1.0 |
| Report | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 15.9 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.0 | NA | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 30 | 22 | 33 | 23 | 26 | 23 | 32 | 189 | 93.1% | 1 |
| Article, other | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 4 | 100.0% | 1 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 5 | 30 | 18 | 11 | 11 | 21 | 15 | 111 | 33.3% | 1 |
| Conference paper, other | 1 | 1 | 1 | NA | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Chapter in book | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 |
| Report | 5 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 29 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 11.9 | 39.0 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 31.5% |
| 2015 | 12.2 | 48.3 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 21.4% |
| 2016 | 16.7 | 69.3 | 4.2 | 5.7 | 34.3% |
| 2017 | 11.7 | 68.6 | 5.9 | 1.7 | 14.8% |
| 2018 | 10.4 | 70.3 | 6.8 | 0.8 | 8.0% |
| Total | 62.8 | 295.6 | 4.7 | 14.6 | 23.3% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 27.1 | 1.49 | 5.9 | 21.8% |
| 2015-2017 | 29.3 | 1.45 | 5.7 | 19.4% |
| 2016-2018 | 30.1 | 1.56 | 6.2 | 20.6% |
| 2017-2019 | 27.5 | 1.65 | 5.4 | 19.5% |
| Total | 54.6 | 1.57 | 11.3 | 20.6% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 26 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 53.6%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 65 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 92%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 26.5 | 1.21 | 9.1 | 34.4% |
| 2015-2017 | 28.7 | 1.15 | 9.1 | 31.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 29.5 | 1.13 | 7.6 | 25.8% |
| 2017-2019 | 27.5 | 1.15 | 6.3 | 23.1% |
| 2018-2020 | 30.6 | 1.10 | 6.0 | 19.7% |
| Total | 67.2 | 1.14 | 17.8 | 26.4% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 65 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 88.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 74 | 14 | 18.9% | 48 | 64.9% |
| 2015-2017 | 73 | 13 | 17.8% | 44 | 60.3% |
| 2016-2018 | 73 | 10 | 13.7% | 45 | 61.6% |
| 2017-2019 | 64 | 5 | 7.8% | 41 | 64.1% |
| 2018-2020 | 71 | 4 | 5.6% | 48 | 67.6% |
| Total | 167 | 20 | 12.0% | 108 | 64.7% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 64 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 86.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11.8 |
| Germany | 26 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.8 |
| France | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.2 |
| Spain | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.5 |
| Brazil | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.7 |
| Denmark | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.4 |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3.4 |
| Netherlands | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.1 |
| Switzerland | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 |
| Japan | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| Australia | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| Italy | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| Russian Federation | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 |
| China | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Canada | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Singapore | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Poland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swedish e-Science Research Center | University Other | Sweden | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.0 |
| Swedish Defence Research Agency | Institute | Sweden | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.1 |
| Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) | University | United States | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.6 |
| Uppsala University | University | Sweden | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.5 |
| Technical University of Denmark (DTU) | University | Denmark | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.4 |
| Aeronautics Institute of Technology | Institute | Brazil | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.3 |
| Charles III University of Madrid | University | Spain | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.2 |
| University of Paris-Saclay | University | France | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.8 |
| Karlsruhe Institute of Technology | University | Germany | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.6 |
| Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SeRC) | Institute | Sweden | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.3 |
| Argonne National Laboratory | Institute | United States | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.2 |
| Delft University of Technology | University | Netherlands | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 |
| Technical University of Madrid | University | Spain | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 |
| University of Cambridge | University | United Kingdom | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 |
| German Aerospace Center (DLR) | Other Public | Germany | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 |
| University of Melbourne | University | Australia | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Universidade Estadual Paulista | University | Brazil | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | University | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Stockholm University | University | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| University of Adelaide | University | Australia | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Philipps-Universität Marburg | University | Germany | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Queen Mary University of London | University | United Kingdom | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| University of Paris-Sud 11 | University | France | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| ETH Zurich | University | Switzerland | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Nanyang Technological University | University | Singapore | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) | University | Switzerland | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| University of Ottawa | University | Canada | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Keio University | University | Japan | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| University of Tokyo | University | Japan | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| University of Bologna | University | Italy | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Russian Academy of Sciences | Other Public | Russian Federation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Upstream CFD GmbH | Company | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics SB RAS | Institute | Russian Federation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG) | Institute | Germany | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Sapienza University of Rome | University | Italy | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Aban Fdn | Institute | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Paris Diderot University | University | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Scania AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Shanghai Jiao Tong University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Stanford University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Umeå University | University | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Aix-Marseille University | University | France | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Inst Tecnol Aeronaut ITA | NA | Brazil | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Linköping University | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Texas Tech University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| University of Stuttgart | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Altair | Company | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Altair | Company | Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Czestochowa Tech Univ | NA | Poland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Darmstadt University of Technology | University | Germany | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| French Aerospace Lab (ONERA) | Institute | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| National Centre for Meteorological Research | Other Public | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Peking University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech) | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Tsinghua University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Utrecht University | University | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Zhejiang University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Politecnico di Milano | University | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Toulouse | University | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Airbus | Company | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Aries Ingeniería y Sistemas | Company | Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Cranfield University | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Ecole Polytechnique | University | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) | Other Public | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology | University | Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Mando Corporation | Company | Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE | University | Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Genoa | University | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Warwick | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Kore University of Enna (UKE) | University | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Technische Universität Dresden | University | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Edinburgh | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Rostock | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Nottingham Trent University | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Queen’s University | University | Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| AI Sustainabil Ctr | NA | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| BC3 | NA | Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) | Institute | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Otago | University | New Zealand | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 34 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 18 | 47.1% |
| 2015 | 33 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 27.3% |
| 2016 | 48 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 30 | 37.5% |
| 2017 | 28 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 16 | 42.9% |
| 2018 | 31 | 23 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 74.2% |
| 2019 | 33 | 21 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 63.6% |
| 2020 | 38 | 27 | 7 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 71.1% |
| Total | 245 | 126 | 33 | 38 | 48 | 7 | 119 | 51.4% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 13.1 | 179.6 | 13.8 | 2.4 | 18.5% |
| 2015 | 22.6 | 157.8 | 7.0 | 8.4 | 37.2% |
| 2016 | 18.1 | 173.1 | 9.6 | 4.1 | 22.6% |
| 2017 | 15.1 | 112.4 | 7.4 | 3.8 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 13.8 | 97.2 | 7.0 | 3.4 | 24.9% |
| 2019 | 16.8 | 71.2 | 4.3 | 7.0 | 41.6% |
| 2020 | 21.0 | 52.9 | 2.5 | 8.8 | 42.1% |
| Total | 120.3 | 844.2 | 7.0 | 37.9 | 31.5% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 49.2 | 1.25 | 9.1 | 18.6% |
| 2015-2017 | 51.5 | 1.08 | 6.1 | 11.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 43.2 | 1.16 | 5.7 | 13.2% |
| 2017-2019 | 39.7 | 1.30 | 5.5 | 13.8% |
| Total | 88.8 | 1.27 | 14.6 | 16.4% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 111 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 95.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 36.7 | 1.27 | 24.0 | 65.4% |
| 2015-2017 | 36.3 | 1.23 | 23.3 | 64.1% |
| 2016-2018 | 35.5 | 1.26 | 23.4 | 65.9% |
| 2017-2019 | 30.7 | 1.36 | 21.8 | 70.8% |
| 2018-2020 | 36.3 | 1.38 | 23.0 | 63.4% |
| Total | 83.5 | 1.32 | 53.4 | 64.0% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 133 | 2 | 1.5% | 80 | 60.2% |
| 2015-2017 | 134 | 3 | 2.2% | 78 | 58.2% |
| 2016-2018 | 119 | 4 | 3.4% | 80 | 67.2% |
| 2017-2019 | 107 | 3 | 2.8% | 70 | 65.4% |
| 2018-2020 | 120 | 2 | 1.7% | 77 | 64.2% |
| Total | 287 | 5 | 1.7% | 178 | 62.0% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 107 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 96.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
